Since the start of the recession, a growing number of sexual harassment complaints have come from men. Some 16.4% of all sexual harassment claims—or 2,094 claims—were filed by men in fiscal 2009, up from 15.4%, or 1,869 claims, in fiscal 2006, according to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. While male victims sometimes experience behavior like groping and unwanted sexual advances, employment lawyers say increasingly “locker room” type behavior like vulgar talk and horseplay with sexual connotations have been the subject of claims. View article here: More Men Filing Sexual Harassment Claims.
When a formal charge of sexual harassment is filed with the EEOC or the Hawaii Civil Rights Commission, or a lawsuit is brought in federal court or Hawaii State court, one primary issue will be what, if anything, the employer did to prevent or stop the harassment.
There are several specific steps an employer should take to emphasize to employees that sexual harassment will not be tolerated in the workplace. An employer’s managers and supervisors take on an important role at each of these steps. One of the most important steps is the effective implementation of a sexual harassment policy. Read more…
A work environment is considered “hostile” under both Hawaii and federal law when sexual behavior is severe or pervasive enough to alter the complaining employee’s employment conditions and create an abusive work environment. This occurs when unwelcome sexual or gender-based conduct has the purpose or effect of creating an intimidating or offensive work environment or unreasonably interfering with an individual’s work performance.
Sexual flirtation or innuendo, even vulgar language or sexist remarks that are trivial or merely annoying, would probably not meet the legal definition of a hostile environment. But such activity can still be prohibited by workplace policy and should be stopped as soon as management becomes aware of it. Read more…
November 10th, 2009
admin
During an investigation into a harassment claim involving allegations of harassment by text message, can an employer access employees’ text messages outside of a discovery request without violating their expectations of privacy? View an article on this issue here: Text Harassment Investigations.
Prompt, thorough and effective investigations are an integral part of an employer’s prevention and correction of sexual and other forms of unlawful harassment in the workplace. Recent United States Supreme Court decisions have emphasized the importance of the employer’s efforts to prevent sexually harassing behavior and promptly correct any such behavior which does occur.
These decisions establish that in sexual harassment job cases involving harassment by a supervisor where no tangible employment action is taken, the employer may avoid liability if it can prove as an affirmative defense that: (1) it exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct promptly any sexually harassing behavior and (2) the employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of the employer’s anti-harassment policies and any preventive or corrective opportunities. Read more…
“One of the few women ever to write for Late Night with David Letterman, the author (a longtime V.F. contributor) remembers a hostile, sexually charged atmosphere. What’s to be done? Start by breaking late night’s all-male gag order.” Letterman Show-Sexually Charged Atmosphere.
It is well established now under federal Title VII law that an employer is liable for actionable sexual harassment caused by a supervisor with “immediate (or successively higher) authority over the employee.” However, in cases where the employee does not suffer a “tangible employment action,” such as discharge, demotion, or an unfavorable reassignment, there is an affirmative defense that an employer may raise to avoid Title VII liability and damages.
Read more…
